|

High Density, Low Rise, Zero Carbon

Andy Macintosh is an Associate at Feilden Clegg Bradley Studio. In this article Andy reflects on our theme of 'care', by looking at high density, low rise and zero carbon in masterplans.

 

There are many well-used references for advocating low rise density over height in a masterplan: that housing densities in low-rise Notting Hill are higher than many tower blocks; or that Barcelona and Paris are denser than New York. Many will remember the diagrams of different ways of achieving density from the GLA’s “Housing for a Compact City” from a couple of decades ago. Compact low-rise makes for a more humane environment, but how do these decisions impact the future carbon footprint of the buildings within the masterplan?

At FCBStudios we have measured carbon in our buildings for some time. Using our FCBS Carbon Calculator, now all early stage projects undergo a whole life carbon and energy assessment. As an early indication it allows us to make informed judgements about operational and embodied carbon at early stages. For masterplan projects, that process is less clear because decisions about structural materials or heating systems are not necessarily within our scope.

Above Images: Carbon vs Height Graphs

However, the potential climate impacts of decisions are still huge, so we have been examining the research basis for some of those intuitions about urban design:

Operational Carbon

Services aside, future operational energy will be helped by a good form factor, by sensible floor plate depths, and by orientation. LETI’s Climate Emergency Design Guide is an excellent reference. More surprisingly, the height of buildings seems to have a big impact on operational energy consumption. Research by UCL Energy Institute on 600 existing buildings across London showed a strong correlation between increasing height and increasing energy consumption. Low-rise buildings are not necessarily comparable as they offer different building typologies, but a less efficient form-factor would typically lead to higher consumption per sqm. Two pieces of UCL research plus other studies of energy and height are compared in the graph shown here, with the trend line shown in yellow.

Above Image: FCBStudios proposals for Gallions and Great Eastern Quays

Embodied Carbon

We shouldn’t underestimate the impact of the masterplan design on embodied carbon, even though no materials are decided. Decisions about the height of taller buildings within a masterplan will have a major influence on the embodied carbon.

Embodied carbon per sqm increases with height because of the increasing stresses on the building structure. There are also increases in lifts and risers, which add to structural shear walls. The structural ‘square-cube law’ is included in simplified form in Thomson Architecture’s carbon calculator, and other academic studies on structures show similar patterns with varying steepness. The trend from all these studies shows an embodied carbon ‘sweet spot’ at roughly 5-6 stories.

In addition to these increases, the choice of height also limits options for the building structure. The 18m rule prohibits structural timber for taller residential buildings, and in commercial buildings structural timber gets harder to insure as height increases.

Above Image: FCBStudios masterplan for South Kilburn

Density

The graphs here suggest an ‘optimum’ at around 4-6 stories, although we frequently build taller in city centres, and often with good reason. Transport makes up about one third of an average person’s carbon footprint, and for less urban sites it can dwarf the operational and embodied carbon. Building more densely where there are good transport connections and low car usage clearly makes environmental sense and has long been the norm for planning policy.

However, that brings us back to the point that density and height are not the same thing. The research summarised here should reinforce our view that whilst high-density will often be a key aspiration for any urban masterplan, our starting point should ideally be to deliver that density in as low rise a scheme as possible. In that way, we improve our chances of achieving net zero carbon within the buildings, when then are delivered.

More Blog Posts.


How do we use innovation and insight to build an even more connected and caring borough?

How do we use innovation and insight to build an even more connected and caring borough?

In a year of turbulence and challenge, families and communities have been disconnected and isolated, bringing many challenges for residents in London and beyond. In turn, pressure on services has continued to rise in order to care for the resulting…

READ MORE
Jestico + Whiles on Darwin Court

Jestico + Whiles on Darwin Court

After nearly 20 successful years, the principles of social interaction and personal choice that we embodied in Darwin Court are more relevant and important than ever. Today, approximately 3.8 million older people live alone, with increased risk of social isolation…

READ MORE
How public realm 2.0 can learn from digital space

How public realm 2.0 can learn from digital space

In London we have a diversity of high-quality public spaces, which have evolved over time and heavily contributed to the ways we use our city. As we emerge from lockdowns and react to new patterns of living and working we…

READ MORE
High Density, Low Rise, Zero Carbon

High Density, Low Rise, Zero Carbon

  There are many well-used references for advocating low rise density over height in a masterplan: that housing densities in low-rise Notting Hill are higher than many tower blocks; or that Barcelona and Paris are denser than New York. Many…

READ MORE
EcoWorld London on how to create a healthy community

EcoWorld London on how to create a healthy community

Image: Aberfeldy Street, Courtesy of EcoWorld London When creating a new community, you cannot just care about the next generation. You have to care about every generation of users and occupiers: doing justice to the people who have lived there…

READ MORE
Unlocking Spaces for Everyone

Unlocking Spaces for Everyone

Image: Elements of Bioclimatic Design © AKT II   Bioclimatic design serves the intersection between ‘biology’ and climate’, and is essentially about designing buildings and landscapes with a response to the local climate so that people have a better experience.…

READ MORE